Brought to you by NOAA NMFS SWFSC ERD
|
Biological and Socioeconomics
|
Brought to you by NOAA NMFS SWFSC ERD |
| griddap | Subset | tabledap | Make A Graph | wms | files | Title | Summary | FGDC | ISO 19115 | Info | Background Info | RSS | Institution | Dataset ID | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1981, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1982, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1983, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1984, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1985, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1986, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1987, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1988, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (44 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2006, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007/ | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2007, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1982, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1983, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1984, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1985, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1986, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1987, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1988, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/ | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005 | Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/index.htmlTable | https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005&showErrors=false&email= | Southeast Fisheries Science Center | CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/ | East Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2009-2017 - DATA | These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nwatervisibility (Sea Water Visibility, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_current\nabiotic_sand_percentage (percent)\nabiotic_hard_bottom_percentage (percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_lt_0_2m (Hard Substrate Relief < 0.2m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_2_0_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.2m < 0.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_5_1_0m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.5m < 1.0m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief1_0_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 1.0m < 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_gt_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief > 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_sum (percent)\nhard_substrate_max_relief_meters (Hard Substrate Max Relief in meters, percent)\ntimebracket (Time bracket)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Location identification)\ntype\n... (46 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email= | NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary | east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0/ | East Flower Garden Banks Physical Monitoring 1990-2019 | These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = TimeSeries\nVARIABLES:\ntimeseries (East Flower Garden Bank Physical 20181221)\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_salinity (Sea Water Temperature, PSU)\nsea_water_turbidity (NTU)\nlocality (Sample Region)\ncrs\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0&showErrors=false&email= | NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary | east_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2004 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (36 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2005 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2006 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2007 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2008 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2009 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2010 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2011 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2012 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2013 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2014 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2015 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/ | Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2016 | This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email= | AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division | 2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/ | Stetson Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2010-2013 - DATA | These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nwatervisibility (Sea Water Visibility, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_current\nabiotic_sand_percentage (percent)\nabiotic_hard_bottom_percentage (percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_lt_0_2m (Hard Substrate Relief < 0.2m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_2_0_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.2m < 0.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_5_1_0m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.5m < 1.0m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief1_0_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 1.0m < 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_gt_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief > 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_sum (percent)\nhard_substrate_max_relief_meters (Hard Substrate Max Relief in meters, percent)\ntimebracket (Time bracket)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Location identification)\ntype\n... (46 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email= | NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary | stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0/ | Stetson Flower Garden Banks Physical Monitoring 1993-2018 | These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = TimeSeries\nVARIABLES:\ntimeseries (Stetson Flower Garden Bank Physical 20181221)\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_salinity (Sea Water Temperature, PSU)\nsea_water_turbidity (NTU)\nlocality (Sample Region)\ncrs\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0&showErrors=false&email= | NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary | stetson_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/ | West Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2009-2017 - DATA | These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nwatervisibility (Sea Water Visibility, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_current\nabiotic_sand_percentage (percent)\nabiotic_hard_bottom_percentage (percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_lt_0_2m (Hard Substrate Relief < 0.2m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_2_0_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.2m < 0.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_5_1_0m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.5m < 1.0m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief1_0_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 1.0m < 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_gt_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief > 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_sum (percent)\nhard_substrate_max_relief_meters (Hard Substrate Max Relief in meters, percent)\ntimebracket (Time bracket)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Location identification)\ntype\n... (46 more variables)\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email= | NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary | west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0 | ||
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.subset | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0 | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.graph | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0/ | West Flower Garden Banks Physical Monitoring 1990-2018 | These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = TimeSeries\nVARIABLES:\ntimeseries (West Flower Garden Bank Physical 20181221)\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_salinity (Sea Water Temperature, PSU)\nsea_water_turbidity (NTU)\nlocality (Sample Region)\ncrs\n | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0_fgdc.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0_iso19115.xml | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0/index.htmlTable | https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0.rss | https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0&showErrors=false&email= | NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary | west_flower_garden_bank_physical_20181221_Data_v0-0 |