griddap
| Subset
| tabledap
| Make A Graph
| wms
| files
| Title
| Summary
| FGDC
| ISO 19115
| Info
| Background Info
| RSS
| Email
| Institution
| Dataset ID
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1981, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1982, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1983, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1984, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1985, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1986, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1987, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1988, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (44 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2006, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2007, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (45 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1981, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1982, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1983, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1984, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1985, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1986, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1987, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1988, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2006, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007/
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Alabama_2007, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\nocurrenceID (occurrence identifcation number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (22 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Alabama_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (reference_Code))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (61 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Florida_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndepth2 (End depth, m)\ndepth3 (Secchi depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (referencd_Code_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\n... (23 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Florida_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1986, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1987, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1988, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2006, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007/
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Louisiana_2007, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.Station.CSA.gear_Code.sample_nr)))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.Station.CAS.gear_Code.aphiaID.sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Louisiana_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1973)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1973
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1974)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1974
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1975)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1975
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1976)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1976
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1977)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1977
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1978)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1978
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1979)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1979
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1980)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1980
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1981)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1981
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1982)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1983)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1984)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1985)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1986)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1987)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1988)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1989)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1990)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1991)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1992)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1993)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1994)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1995)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1996)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1997)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1998)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1999)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2000)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2001)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2002)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2003)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2004)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2005)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number)\nsample_Code\nFKEY (File identifier (date.station_code.gear_code))\nstation_Code\n... (48 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1973)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1973
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1974)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1974
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1975)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1975
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1976)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1976
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1977)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1977
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1978)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1978
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1979)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1979
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1980)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1980
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1981)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1981
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1982)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1983)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1984)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1985)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1986)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1987)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1988)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1989)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1990)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1991)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1992)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1993)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1994)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1995)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1996)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1997)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1998)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_1999)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2000)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2001)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2002)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2003)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2004)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at http://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Mississippi_2005)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Depth below mean sea level, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\noccurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.gear_Code_sample_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Mississippi_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1982, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1982
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1983, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1983
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1984, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1984
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1985, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1985
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1986, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1986
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1987, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1987
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1988, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1988
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ngeodeticDatum (Geodetic Datum)\nsample_nr (Sample number, unknown)\nFKEY (File identifier (date_station_Code_sample_nr_site_number))\nstation_Code\ngear (Gear name)\n... (43 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_DATA_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1982, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1982
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1983, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1983
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1984, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1984
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1985, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1985
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1986, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1986
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1987, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1987
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1988, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1988
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1989, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1989
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1990, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1990
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1991, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1991
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1992, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1992
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1993, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1993
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1994, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1995, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1996, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1997, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1998, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_1999, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2000, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2001, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2002, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2003, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2004, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
| Estuaries are important in supporting much of the fishery production in the Gulf of Mexico, but this support appears to vary widely among different estuarine systems. The main objective of this project was to assess variability among estuaries in supporting fishery species and other abundant nekton. The project is part of a larger effort of the National Marine Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory to develop a Comparative Assessment of Gulf Estuarine Systems (CAGES). The nekton abundance data summarized in this report are available at https://data.gcoos.org. This cooperative study with state natural resources agencies was designed to use fishery independent monitoring data and compare historical catches from 4.9-m and 6.1-m trawl surveys. This report provides an assessment of the abundance, length frequencies, and biomass of 14 species of fish and four species of decapod crustaceans that were either abundant in the samples or economically important. The most abundant species in the analysis include bay anchovy, Atlantic croaker, spot, and brown shrimp. Other fishery species of particular interest include Gulf menhaden, white shrimp, pink shrimp, blue crab, spotted seatrout, southern flounder, and red drum. While the years analyzed varied among states, samples from most estuaries were available and analyzed for the years 1986 to 2005. The 24 estuaries analyzed were identified using the Estuarine and Coastal Drainage Areas delineated by the U. S.Geological Survey and listed in NOAAs Coastal Assessment Framework\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntrajectory (CAGES_Texas_2005, Unknown)\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (Start depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code))\nbasisOfRecord (Basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (Recorded By)\nocurrenceID (Occurrence Identifcation Number (date.station_Code.sample_nr_site_number_station_Code_aphiaID_sample_nr))\n... (21 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Southeast Fisheries Science Center
| CAGES_Texas_CPUE_Trawl_study_OBIS_Occurrence_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_1999
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2000
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2001
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2002
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2003
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2004
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2005
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2006
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2007
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2008
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2009
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2010
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2011
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2012
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2013
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2014
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2015
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2016
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2017
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2018
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2019
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2020
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020/
| CREMP_Dry_Tortugas_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| dt_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_1996
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_1997
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_1998
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_1999
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2000
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2001
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2002
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2003
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2004
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2005
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2006
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2007
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2008
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2009
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2009
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2010
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2011
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2011
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2012
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2013
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2013
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2014
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2015
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2015
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2016
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2017
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2017
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2018
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2019
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2019
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_DATA_v3_2020
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, unknown)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nsubRegionID (sub region sample identitfication)\nhabitatID (habitat identification)\nsiteCode (Code for the Site)\nsiteID (Site identifier, unknown)\nsiteName (Site Name)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\naverageNumberOfPoints (Number of Points analize for sampling area, count)\ntransectLengthInMeters (Side length or transect length in meters of sampling rectangle. Area[m^2] = side length[m] x 2[m] width, m)\ntype\nlanguage\n... (40 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020/index.htmlTable
| https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_DATA_v3_2020
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2009
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2011
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2013
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2015
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2017
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2019
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020/
| CREMP_Florida_Keys_Yearly_Revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020
| The purpose of the Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) is to monitor the status and trends of selected reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary(FKNMS).CREMP assessments have been conducted annually at fixed sites since 1996 and data collectedprovides information on the temporal changes in benthic cover and diversity of stony corals andassociated marine flora and fauna. The core field methods continue to be underwatervideography and timed coral species inventories. Findings presented in this report include datafrom 109 stations at 37 sites sampled from 1996 through 2008 in the Florida Keys and 1999 through 2008 in the Dry Tortugas. The report describes the annual differences (between 2007 and 2008) in the percent cover of major benthic taxa (stony corals, octocorals, sponges, and macroalgae), mean coral species richness and the incidence of stony coral conditions. Additionally, it examines the long-term trends of the major benthic taxa, five coral complex, Montastraea cavernosa, Colpophyllia natans, Siderastrea siderea, and Porites astreoides) and the clionaid sponge, Cliona delitrix.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nObservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date, year)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrence identification (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID))\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism per sample Area in Square Meters(value x 100 = percent coverage)., percent)\norganismQuantityType (Percent Coverage)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\n... (15 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020/index.htmlTable
| https://gcoos4.tamu.edu:8080/erddap/info/index.html?page=1&itemsPerPage=1000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020&showErrors=false&email=
| Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWC-FWRI)
| fk_CREMP_yearly_revisited_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_2020
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_1999
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2000
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2004
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2006
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2008
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2010
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2012
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2014
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2016
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2018
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD ( Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_DATA_v3_5_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_DATA_v3_5_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_DATA_v3_5_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_1999
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2000
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2004
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2006
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2008
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2010
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2012
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2014
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2016
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018/
| Dry_Tortugas_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2018
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| dt_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0/
| East Flower Garden Banks Benthic_Covage Monitoring 1989-2017 - DATA
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_location_number)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (percent cover, percent)\norganismQuantityType (percent of areal covering)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\npercent_colonizable_substrate (percent of colonizable substrate)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedAuthority (Accepted Authorship information for the scientificName)\n... (13 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/
| East Flower Garden Banks Benthic_Covage Monitoring 1989-2017 - OBIS_Occurrence
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_location_number)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (percent cover, percent)\norganismQuantityType (percent of areal covering)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\npercent_colonizable_substrate (percent of colonizable substrate)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedAuthority (Accepted Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\n... (10 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| east_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/
| East Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2009-2017 - DATA
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nwatervisibility (Sea Water Visibility, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_current\nabiotic_sand_percentage (percent)\nabiotic_hard_bottom_percentage (percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_lt_0_2m (Hard Substrate Relief < 0.2m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_2_0_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.2m < 0.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_5_1_0m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.5m < 1.0m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief1_0_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 1.0m < 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_gt_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief > 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_sum (percent)\nhard_substrate_max_relief_meters (Hard Substrate Max Relief in meters, percent)\ntimebracket (Time bracket)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Location identification)\ntype\n... (46 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/
| East Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2009-2017 - OBIS_Occurrence
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Individuals collected, count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (9 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| east_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_1994
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_1995
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_1996
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_1997
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_1998
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_1999
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2000
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2001
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2002
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2003
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2004
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2005
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2006
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2007
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2008
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2009
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2009.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2009&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2009
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2010
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2011
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2011.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2011&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2011
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2012
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2014
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2016
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_DATA_v3.5_2018
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\nprimarySamplingUnit (Primary Sampling Unit)\nstationNumber (Station number, unknown)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nunderwaterVisibilityInMeters (under water Visibility In Meter, meters)\nmapGridNumber (Map grid number, unknown)\nhabitatCD (Habitat Code)\nzoneNumber (Zone number, unknown)\nsubregionNumber (Number of the Subregion, unknown)\nmpaNumber (Marine protected area number, unknown)\nspeciesNumber (Species Number, unknown)\nspeciesCD (Species Code)\nspeciesLength (Observed fork length in cm, cm)\nnumberSeen (average Number of fish seen at given length per 5 Minutes, count)\nobservationTime (Observation Time Interval(time_seen): 1=first 5 minutes, 2=5-10 minutes, 3=after 10-20 minutes, unknown)\nprotection (Area protection, 0=not protected, 1=protected, North Ecological Reserve (TNER), 2= not protected, Dry Tortuga Park)\nbottomType (Bottom Type, Bottom Strata type)\nregion (Sample Region)\n... (41 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_DATA_v3_5_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_DATA_v3_5_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_DATA_v3_5_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_1994
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1994
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_1995
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1995
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_1996
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1996
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_1997
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1997
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_1998
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1998
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_1999
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_1999
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2000
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2000
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2001
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2001
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2002
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2002
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2003
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2003
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2004
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2004
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2005
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2005
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2006
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2006
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2007
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2007
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2008
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2008
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2009
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2009
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2010
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2010
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2011
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2011
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2012
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2012
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2014
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2014
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2016
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2016
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018/
| Florida_Keys_Visual_Census_OBIS_Occurrence_v3.5_2018
| In 1998, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Fisheries Independent Monitoring (FIM) program began a long-term monitoring effort of key reef fish populations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. This effort was aimed at evaluating the relative abundance, size structure, and habitat utilization of specific reef fish species that are targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobs\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (Date_primarySampleUnit_MapGridNumber_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID (occurrenceID (Year_subRegionID_habitatID_SiteCode_siteID_station#_scientificNameID)\norganismQuantity (Average count of observed species per 5 minutes)., count)\norganismQuantityType (average number of fish seen at given length (buddy pair system) within a 5 Minutes interval)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsage (accepted Name Usage)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedNameUsageID (Accepted WoRMS Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (7 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018/index.htmlTable
| https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/science-data/reef-ecology-unit
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Southeast Fischeries Science Center
| fk_OBIS_Occurrence_v3_5_2018
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2004
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (36 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2005
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2006
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2007
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2008
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2009
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2010
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2011
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2012
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2013
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2014
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2015
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, DATA 2016
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_C)\nsea_water_salinity (PSU)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Station number)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\n... (37 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_DATA_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2004
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2004JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2005
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2005JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2006
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2006JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2007
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2007JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2008
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2008JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2009
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2009JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2010
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2010JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2011
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2011JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2012
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2012JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2013
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2013JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2014
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2014JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2015
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2015JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/
| Juvenile Sportfish Monitoring in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, OBIS_Occurrence 2016
| This data set is a component of the Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) Monitoring and Assessment Plan which is a part of the Comprehensive Everglade Restoration Program(CERP).; Thayer,G. and A.J.Chester. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes among basin and channel habitats in Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44:200-219\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Number of Organism in sample Area (500 Square Meters)., count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected during 2 min trawl)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nindividualCount (count)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\norder\nfamily\n... (8 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0&showErrors=false&email=
| AOML Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division
| 2016JuvenileSportfishNOAA_OBIS_Occurrence_Mean_v0_0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0/
| Stetson Flower Garden Banks Benthic_Covage Monitoring 1993-2018 - DATA
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_location_number)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (percent cover, percent)\norganismQuantityType (percent of areal covering)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\npercent_colonizable_substrate (percent of colonizable substrate)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedAuthority (Accepted Authorship information for the scientificName)\n... (13 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/
| Stetson Flower Garden Banks Benthic_Covage Monitoring 1993-2018 - OBIS_Occurrence
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_location_number)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (percent cover, percent)\norganismQuantityType (percent of areal covering)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\npercent_colonizable_substrate (percent of colonizable substrate)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedAuthority (Accepted Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\n... (10 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| stetson_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/
| Stetson Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2010-2013 - DATA
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nwatervisibility (Sea Water Visibility, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_current\nabiotic_sand_percentage (percent)\nabiotic_hard_bottom_percentage (percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_lt_0_2m (Hard Substrate Relief < 0.2m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_2_0_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.2m < 0.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_5_1_0m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.5m < 1.0m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief1_0_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 1.0m < 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_gt_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief > 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_sum (percent)\nhard_substrate_max_relief_meters (Hard Substrate Max Relief in meters, percent)\ntimebracket (Time bracket)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Location identification)\ntype\n... (46 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/
| Stetson Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2010-2013 - OBIS_Occurrence
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Individuals collected, count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (9 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| stetson_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0/
| West Flower Garden Banks Benthic_Covage Monitoring 1989-2017 - DATA
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_location_number)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\ntype\nlanguage\nlicense\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (percent cover, percent)\norganismQuantityType (percent of areal covering)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\npercent_colonizable_substrate (percent of colonizable substrate)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedAuthority (Accepted Authorship information for the scientificName)\n... (13 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_DATA_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/
| West Flower Garden Banks Benthic_Covage Monitoring 1989-2017 - OBIS_Occurrence
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_location_number)\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (percent cover, percent)\norganismQuantityType (percent of areal covering)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\npercent_colonizable_substrate (percent of colonizable substrate)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nacceptedAuthority (Accepted Authorship information for the scientificName)\nkingdom\nphylum\n... (10 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| west_flower_garden_bank_benthic_coverage_20190111_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/
| West Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2009-2017 - DATA
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\nwatervisibility (Sea Water Visibility, m)\nsea_water_temperature (degree_Celsius)\nsea_water_current\nabiotic_sand_percentage (percent)\nabiotic_hard_bottom_percentage (percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_lt_0_2m (Hard Substrate Relief < 0.2m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_2_0_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.2m < 0.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief0_5_1_0m (Hard Substrate Relief 0.5m < 1.0m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief1_0_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief 1.0m < 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_gt_1_5m (Hard Substrate Relief > 1.5m, percent)\nhard_substrate_relief_sum (percent)\nhard_substrate_max_relief_meters (Hard Substrate Max Relief in meters, percent)\ntimebracket (Time bracket)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nsampleID (Sample Identification number)\nstationNumber (Location identification)\ntype\n... (46 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_DATA_v0-0
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.subset
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/tabledap/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.graph
|
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/files/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/
| West Flower Garden Banks Fish Monitoring 2009-2017 - OBIS_Occurrence
| These datasets are part of the longterm monitoring program of the water quality and benthic communities in the East Flower Garden Bank (EFGB), West Flower Garden Bank (WFGB) and Stetson Bank.\n\ncdm_data_type = Point\nVARIABLES:\nobservations\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\neventDate (Event Date)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ngeodeticDatum (geodetic Datum)\ndepth (sea water depth, m)\ndatasetID (Dataset Identification Number)\ndatasetName (Dataset Name)\nownerInstitutionCode (Owner Institution Code)\neventID (Event Identification Number (eventDate_sampleID_location_station#))\nbasisOfRecord (basis Of Record)\nrecordedBy (recorded By)\noccurrenceID ((evenDate_sampleID_location_station#_scientificNameID_sample#)\norganismQuantity (Individuals collected, count)\norganismQuantityType (Individuals collected)\noccurrenceStatus (A statement about the presence or absence of a Taxon at a Location.)\nvernacularName (Common, vernacular Name)\nscientificName (Scientific Name)\nscientificNameID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Aphia Database Identification Number)\nscientificNameAuthorship (Authorship information for the scientificName)\nacceptedNameUsage (Accepted Scientific Name)\nacceptedNameUsageID (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Accepted Aphia Database Identification Number)\nkingdom\nphylum\nclass\n... (9 more variables)\n
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_fgdc.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0_iso19115.xml
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/info/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0/index.htmlTable
| https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ocd/ocdweb/seatrout.html
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/rss/west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0.rss
| https://gcoos4.geos.tamu.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0&showErrors=false&email=
| NOAA Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
| west_fgb_fish_2019_01_24_2_OBIS_Occurrence_v0-0
|